subscribe via rss
31 Jan 2010

Liverpool Theatre Review: Impropriety At The Kazimier

Author: agirvan | Filed under: Liverpool, Theatre Review

Penelope LiverpoolLiverpool improv group Impropriety took to the stage of the Kazimier last night for the inaugural presentation of their newly formed group. Familiar faces were certainly present on stage and in the audience with the event’s programme highlighting the inclusion of many members of the 2008 minute improv marathon and student improv group Purple Circle into a cast which numbered some 20 performers.

For Liverpool residents who have not been to the Kazimier, it is certainly well worth a visit. Nestled in Wolstenholme Square next to the Nation night club, Jorge Pardo’s colourful sculpture ‘Penelope’ and opposite the Pleasure Rooms strip bar, it is a venue run by The Arts Organisation, a group dedicated to artistic squatting of sorts, “enabling the legal occupation of disused spaces” as they express it on the Property Solutions section of their website. You will know them, probably, as the folk who run the TAO Gallery on Slater Street and the very well known Mello Mello.

The Kaz, as it is known amongst my friends, is an incredible night club space, apparently abandoned and resurrected by The Arts Organisation into one of Liverpool’s most flexible arts venues. As a club-night venue it appeals to Liverpool’s alternative scene, hosting extravagant fancy dress evenings. As a theatre venue, it has received a number of small independent productions and its multi-leveled interior has given directors a lot to play with.

Last night saw the venue fully tabled with the stage at one end, a formation which worked well as it meant the various levels could be used to give the audience a view of the stage. As an audience member I was not too impressed, having paid as much as everyone else to get into the venue, to be told that there were no more seats left and that I should find somewhere around the venue to perch. Perching as I was at the back of the auditorium may have been fine if the performance had not run for 3 hours, with the entire event going up at least 15 minutes late.

The night’s format gave plenty of opportunity for the performers to show off. In three acts the group managed to at least play fleeting lip service to just about every genre of improv theatre. The first act of the evening took a Theatresports format, with groups battling each other for points awarded both for their completion of improv tasks and for style from a panel of judges. There were some laugh out loud moments in this hour long stint of improv games, as there were throughout the performance, but the entire thing seemed to take about three times as long as it should.

The performers appeared to take a while to warm up, disappointing given the size of the audience they had to bounce off, and the energy never seemed to reach the critical mass needed to keep one gag flowing into another. Our host for the evening, Ian Hayles, did his best to get the audience in the mood, playing around with rounds of applause before bringing the massive cast on stage, but the heckles from the lively Scouse audience seemed to throw him off more than they should. A dedicated scorer for the Theatresports section of the night may have made the comedy flow more easily than the frequent attempts at maths allowed.

The middle section saw Show Off! demonstrate their musical improvisation skills. With suggestions having been taken from the over capacity crowd before the lights went down, the group had a lot of audience material to work with for their take on a musical theatre award ceremony. The format worked well and the group showed off their best voices excellently. Particularly of note were Kenny Thompson and Lauren Silver whose number from the audience suggested ‘Abattoir, The Musical’ managed to hit as many meat jokes as one can imagine. The group’s final musical number was set like all of the worst musicals often are – on ice. The performers picked up on this meaning they would have to mime skating about the stage, an action with nothing but comic potential, but missed that they did not have to sing about the fact they were skating. Maybe few of them have been unlucky enough to sit through any Disney ice spectaculars.

The third act took the same format as the first, however more of the performers graced the stage at the same time, giving the whole thing a bit of a messy appearance. Again, I would have loved to see the entire thing take about half as much time as it did. It was here that we saw both the potential of what Impropriety will hopefully present in future and the reality of what they were able to bring to Saturday evening. Trevor Fleming showed in a brief two handed outing with Lee McPherson what the group can pull out of the bag. Taking the unfortunate situation of a child suffering from leukaemia on a day out with his Dad, the scene was irreverently funny, raising the stakes for both the relationship between the two characters on stage and the actors with their audience. It was genuinely funny, leaving you wondering just how far they were prepared to push the comedy and tantalisingly close to making the show up paced and engaging. The rest of the third act trundled to a finish, with the entire cast getting their own opportunity for a bit of musical improvisation with the closing number.

I think it was more than just the fact I was left standing against the back wall of the auditorium for the duration of the performance that made me think the night had gone on too long. The group are obviously familiar with the long format that improv comedy can take: I have watched two of their associated improvathon performances and have been impressed with the results. The launch night of this new group however, should have been a short, snappy, high energy performance, not the marathon we were presented with.

The group will return for The Last Resort, The 2o10 Minute Improvathon set in a 1950’s summer camp on 10 and 11 April at the Kazimier, which should be well worth a watch. The event last night was a launch and as a starting point they have certainly put a stake in the ground for both production values and the size of audience they can attract. I think the quality of the output over all can only rise with time, the individual members have certainly demonstrated on previous outings what they are capable of. I look forward to seeing it once it has reached its full potential.

Photo credit: Hdod on Flickr

  • DancingRat
    Hi Andrew,

    Thanks for your thoughts... sorry that we didn't get everything right but we are a new company and the event was a new thing for us and the Kaz to put on.

    I did get in touch with you behind the scenes to see if you would put right some of the inaccuracies in your blog, which you agreed to do, but as this seems to have slipped your mind I thought I'd post here to ask you again.

    Firstly, and most importantly for me having been a pupil of Keith Johnstone's, there was no part of the evening that used the Theater Sports Format or any other of the formats that he originated. Those formats are subject to copyright and Keith himself encourages people to invent their own rather than use his. The Prizefight format is our own invention and nothing to do with any other copyrighted material.

    Yes there were not enough seats for the amount of people that were there but that is quite a normal thing for Improvisation and comedy in a pub club setting. There were some people who did have priority seating (so in fact not everyone payed the same price for there entry) and we had to make sure they were all served, after that it was always going to be a first come first served kind of affair and we always knew that this would be the case. Tickets guaranteed entry, not seating.

    Dealing with 'Heckles From A Lively Scouse Audience'. There was only one so called 'Heckler' there as far as I was concerned, and in fact the lady in question was hugely drunk and was quite abusive to not only myself and the other performers but also to those of the audience around her. There are two ways to deal with that situation, to attack it or to ignore it. After the first few incidents I chose, on my feet, to not engage with her. Most of the audience who spoke to me afterwords praised my handling of a difficult situation but it may be that from your position you couldn't hear the content of her banter. This situation will not happen again as the lady in question has been blacklisted from further shows.

    Heckling is not usual at Improv shows as usually the audience have an investment in seeing the thing that they have helped invent go right and it is a shock when that spirit isn't entered into.

    Finally The Last Resort (Which I'm glad you are looking forward to) will be our first Improvathon, the others you mentioned were organized by other improvisation groups and some of our performers were invited to take part. The Last Resort has a chance to be just as charmingly shambolic as the rest of our output.

    Thanks very much for the right to reply, and thanks for coming to the event... Look forward to seeing you at another of our events.
  • agirvan
    @colinwigan

    The event was certainly incredible value for money, and you make the point well. Contrasting the length of performance and the size of cast with comparable events at other theatres around the city the guys from Impropriety certainly did present an engaging event.

    I agree with you that the Kazimier is indeed a fantastic venue. I have seen a number of events there and am always impressed with what groups are able to do with the space. "Bohemian" is probably the perfect word to use to describe the space and the atmosphere was indeed very friendly, I too knew a number of people in the audience and on the stage.

    Maybe I'm too traditional a theatre goer to expect a venue to seat all its audience members. It probably boils down to jealousy that I was not in the body of the kirk with my own table, but instead left perching against the back wall for the duration, the detachment from the action probably also detracted from the atmosphere you mention.

    I too look forwards to seeing Impropriety again, particularly their long form improvathon, a style of event I have seen them pull of very well before.

    Thanks a lot for taking the time to visit and read my blog. I'm sorry we didn't see eye to eye on the event but I'm glad you've presented your personal opinion on the event in the comments and given an opposing view to my own. Thank you.
  • agirvan
    @Impropriety_Fan

    I thought I did a fair job of reviewing the event, voicing my balanced opinion, highlighting both positive and negative points about the evening. It is true that I felt there were some negative points about the show but if I had set out write an entirely damning piece then I probably wouldn't have bothered posting it. There would have been nothing productive or constructive about it.

    It's true that the person in the front row giving Ian abuse all evening was probably drunk however I felt he was distracted more than a professional performer who offers classes on improvisation should be in the situation. This was all that was meant by the comment and again, I feel that other parts of the review highlight the very positive parts of the performance.

    To expect me to take this review down, however, I think is naive. The world we now live in as one where each and every member of the audience has a voice and the ability to post their views to the masses. There are other ways I could have written this review, posting it all over the internet anonymously, and probably, with far less thought being put into what I was writing. It is very easy to write things anonymously on the internet, as you have found posting your comment in such a fashion. Every member of our audiences now have the ability to voice their opinions on our work, on Facebook, Twitter and on their blogs. That is all I have done with my personal opinions on the piece. I paid my entrance fee and therefore believe that I have the right to voice my opinions on the piece.

    Thank you very much for taking the time to read my piece and especially for taking the time to comment. I, like you, can't wait to see what Impropriety as a group are able to produce. As I mention frequently in my piece above I have seen lots of fantastic work by those involved and look forwards to seeing the group develop.
  • colinwigan
    Clearly the reviewer was not at the same event as everyone else. I also paid the same as you and was quite happy to be standing throughout the entire, excellent, performance. The venue was ideal for the event - relaxed, a little 'bohemian', and lit to perfection. It is not a formal theatre and so it will never be possible for 100% seating - if people want that then it'll take away from the whole event and increase costs. The atmosphere throughout was light, engaging and relaxed - enabling people to change places to improve vantage point, get a beer, have a smoke outside or whatever else took their fancy. I took up a standing place near the front and it was a true delight to see the faces of the capacity 200+ audience in almost constant laughter (minus yourself, it seems) . The Impropriety team were intelligent, witty, quick thinking - just plain outstanding. The acts were, short, snappy and with masses of energy - just what were you watching? The acts were only two-hours long, not 3 as you suggest - even at that it was the best value event I've been to in a long time - not too long, not too short - just right! I'm looking forward to seeing them again.
  • Impropriety_Fan
    After going to see many Impropriety shows, I feel that this review is egregious, where you not watching the show i was? I find that even the good comments are snatched away, i think you have been very quick to jugde somthing that is growing fast, and doesnt need majorly personal veiws aired as a review to put it down the way you have. to quote ''not the marathon we were presented with.''

    ''Our host for the evening, Ian Hayles, did his best to get the audience in the mood, playing around with rounds of applause before bringing the massive cast on stage, but the heckles from the lively Scouse audience seemed to throw him off more than they should''

    I personally thought he played very well! There was no mention of the raving drunk sat at the front trying to put everyone off? but i see you have been very picky to choose what you put in your review.

    For someone who so highly regards himself and is in his third year at university, I dont think personally you have the right to post a review on the internet when you didnt even tell the cast and crew your where reviewing them. My best advice for you is do us all a favour, and take it off?
blog comments powered by Disqus